Wind power, is it worth it?
Apr 05, 2012 | 1149 views | 3 3 comments | 8 8 recommendations | email to a friend | print
To the Editor:

I would like to make a few comments on the article in The Deerfield Valley News on March 15, about the town of Wilmington’s appeal of the US Forest Service’s approval of wind turbines on National Forest land. The spokesperson for the selectboard points out that environmental groups have remained silent; to those I would also add our politicians. We also have a governor who actively promotes wind turbines, even in state forests, and goes so far as to send out young VPIRG activists as missionaries for the cause, which I myself experienced last summer. Add to this the campaign to close Vermont Yankee, which is to be replaced by energy savings and “green” and “clean” electricity. This is also an election year and one can suspect that the Obama administration, after the Solyndra scandal, which cost us taxpayers over half a billion dollars, is eager to get “clean” energy projects going.

I believe it is time for Wilmington to add some new arguments to try to stop this project. Has it been subjected to a complete life cycle analysis yet?

This measures the total environmental impact, including the production and emission of greenhouse gases, from the mining of raw materials, manufacturing, installation and power generation, to final dismantling and site restoration. This is quantified in terms of greenhouse gases per kilowat hour of electricity generated. Since windpower is intermittent and thus quite inefficient, the result is quite the opposite of what the propaganda is telling us: it is neither green nor clean. Nuclear and hydro have by far better values and also serve as baseload generators. In this capacity they also function as “spinning reserve” for wind turbines hooked up to the grid. This fact is generally not mentioned by the wind power lobby. This means also that one cannot turn off other power sources because of wind power. That in turn leads to the question, what gain do we really have from unreliable wind power?

For years I have been able to observe wind turbines on a daily basis for long periods during different seasons on a windy coastal plain. I have been surprised at how often they stop because of inadequate winds. Although I am an old man, I am not blind and my observations are completely in line with what experts, not Vermont politicians, antinukers, and others likeminded tell us.

P.S. - A new documentary movie called “Windfall” details what is happening to some communities in upstate New York with the coming of wind turbines.

Per Alin

Comments-icon Post a Comment
Annette Smith
April 24, 2012
This is what wind turbine development in Vermont looks like

Windfall, the movie, is being shown at the Dorset Long Trail School on Thursday, April 26 at 7 p.m.
Tony Lopez
April 18, 2012
Unfortunately, The present administration is pushing hard to get many "clean energy" projects up and running. In this case at our expense, Once this project is started, many other plans will soon follow. Ridge lines in our national forest were not meant for this,

Many people think this will help, Not me, I personally think it will

be a big mistake, Wilmington will be for ever effected, These proposed turbines are more than double the size of what is

Wayne Andrews
April 05, 2012
The writer makes some good points but all sources of power have their vices. I have seen many a hydro station not operating all turbines due to low water.

How about the minimum release of water not used for generation just to supply kayakers some fun? Solar arrays are not as efficient during overcast days. The list goes on and on.

The idea here is to create a variety of power supply so a certain handful cannot have a monopoly on the rest of us. The big oil people come to mind.

Comment Policy

In an effort to promote reasoned discussion, transparency, and integrity in online commenting, The Deerfield Valley News requires anyone posting comments to identify themselves using their real name. Anonymous commenting will not be allowed. All comments will be subject to approval before posting, and may take up to 24 hours for approval to be granted.

We encourage civil discourse among readers, and ask that they be willing to stand behind their identities and their comments. No personal harassment or hate speech will be tolerated. Please be succinct and to the point. For longer comments, please consider submitting a letter to the editor instead. It will appear in both the print and online editions.

All comments will be reviewed, and we reserve the right to reject, edit or remove any comment for any reason. For questions or to express concerns feel free to contact our office at (802) 464-3388.